- Rats trained to drive tiny cars showed reduced stress markers, suggesting engagement in complex tasks reduces anxiety.
- Self-driven rats experienced cognitive and emotional benefits not seen in those passively moved in the same vehicles.
- The study emphasizes neuroplasticity, showing rats can adapt their brains to learn new task sequences.
- Behavioral and biological signs indicate rats may have felt positive emotions when voluntarily driving.
- These findings raise ethical questions in neuroscience, calling for more humane animal treatment based on emotional capacity.
In a lab that seemed more like a Pixar short rather than a place for scientific study, researchers at the University of Richmond taught rats to drive small vehicles constructed from clear plastic food containers. The rats willingly learned to steer toward treats—Froot Loops, specifically. While the setup was undeniably cute, the neuroscience behind it examines deep questions: Can animals experience joy? How do complex tasks shape emotional and cognitive health? This fun experiment becomes a serious investigation into animal emotions, neuroscience research, and mental strength—even among rodents.
The Science Behind the Tiny Rat Cars
A concept from behavioral neuroscientist Dr. Kelly Lambert and her team, this 2019 study involved teaching rats to drive miniature cars across an arena to get food rewards. The steering mechanism was cleverly simple: three copper bars acted as controls—left, center, and right—starting the car to turn or move forward when touched with a paw.
These mini vehicles, built from see-through plastic with secured electrical bases, allowed the rats to observe their surroundings while learning to coordinate movements. The rats weren’t pushed or externally guided. Instead, they were taught the rules and left to move through the space on their own, motivated by sugary cereal bits.
While training rats to drive may sound more like a fun curiosity than real science, the learning tasks activated goal-directed behavior circuits in the brain, especially in the prefrontal cortex. The researchers measured biological data before, during, and after the experiment—including fecal samples to assess corticosterone, a hormone marker that shows stress in rodents.
What were the results? Rats that drove themselves (called the “driver group”) had notably lower stress hormone levels compared to the “yoked” rats, who were passively driven to the reward without any control over the process.
Operationalizing Emotion: How Do Scientists Study Joy in Animals?
Rats cannot tell us they are happy in words, but scientists have created a refined set of tools to infer emotional states. Emotion studies in animals often depend on a combination of physiological markers, behavioral signals, and neurobiological responses.
In the driving rat experiment, stress evaluation focused on corticosterone metabolite measurements. These markers increased sharply during early training but decreased notably as rats achieved mastery. This change suggests not just adaptation but possibly enjoyment or satisfaction.
Other indirect signs included
- Behavioral Anticipation: Rats willingly engaged with the task even before food rewards were given.
- Exploratory Behavior: Rats came closer to the vehicles with curiosity and showed learning retention over repeated sessions.
- Resiliency Indicators: Lower stress levels correlated with task success, implying a potential protective psychological effect.
These findings are consistent with a wider field of affective neuroscience that classifies emotions functionally—as adaptations to stimuli that start cognitive and behavioral changes useful for survival and well-being.
The Reward Experience vs. The Reward Itself
One of the most important findings in this study was the difference between earning a reward versus simply getting it. Rats that actively performed the driving task to get treats experienced not just positive reinforcement, but also signs of emotional well-being.
In contrast, the “yoked” rats, used as a control group, were placed in identical vehicles but had no control over movement. They received the same amount and type of reward, but without choice. Their stress levels were higher, their interest in the vehicle lower, and their engagement minimal.
This critical difference supports the idea that self-initiated, meaningful actions (even in rats) can offer intrinsic rewards that externally given gifts cannot.
It mirrors findings in human behavioral psychology—achievement through effort often feels more rewarding than effortless consumption. It is not just what we get, but how we get it, that shapes emotional outcomes.
Neuroplasticity in Action: Training Rats to Perform Complex Tasks
The ability of rats to learn how to operate a completely unfamiliar and complex object—a vehicle—in order to reach a goal reveals a surprising degree of cognitive flexibility. This flexibility relies on neuroplasticity, the brain’s notable ability to adapt structurally and functionally in response to environmental demands.
Each step in the task brought new neural patterns into action
- Cognition: Understanding the relationship between the controls and movement.
- Motor Learning: Coordinating front paw movements to achieve steering accuracy.
- Memory Consolidation: Keeping the skill and applying it across trials.
- Sensory-Motor Integration: Adjusting efforts in response to visual and tactile feedback.
Learning how to drive affected multiple brain systems. Rewiring happened in emotional centers like the limbic system, decision-making areas in the prefrontal cortex, and motor neurons coordinating paw-eye pathways.
This opens the door for using similar animal models to study motivation-based therapies, cognitive recovery, and even neurodegeneration—all via naturalistic tasks.
What Is ‘Rat Joy’? Behavioral and Neurochemical Evidence
So, are we just giving human traits to rats when we say they enjoy driving? Not necessarily. While we should be careful in mapping human feelings directly onto animals, rats show clear behaviors known to relate to positive emotional states.
Earlier work from Jaak Panksepp, a pioneer in affective neuroscience, identified 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (often compared to laughter) emitted by rats during pleasant stimuli, such as social play or tickling (Panksepp, 2007). While the driving car study didn’t record these vocalizations specifically, the voluntary engagement and physiological changes offer strong evidence for enjoyment.
Here are some behaviors linked to positive affect seen in the rats
- Repeated voluntary task participation
- Anticipation and alertness pre-task
- Reduced latency in reward seeking
- Fewer escape behaviors or stress-related freezing
Taken together, these findings strongly suggest that rats were not only learning but perhaps experiencing something similar to joy.
The Role of the Prefrontal Cortex and Reward Systems
Consider the neurological complexity behind steering a car, even for a rat. Each action—identifying direction, reaching with the correct paw, adjusting after errors—uses different brain regions.
One of the most important is the prefrontal cortex, responsible for executive function, impulse control, and planning. In both rats and humans, this area combines sensory input with motor output to guide purposeful behavior.
Additionally, dopaminergic reward pathways, involving the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area, have a role in motivation and satisfaction. Anticipating a reward can be as emotionally powerful as receiving it. Since anticipatory behaviors were noticeable, we infer that these reward systems were very active.
This shows how activities rooted in agency—not just reward consumption—are likely to stimulate strong and emotionally stabilizing neural circuits.
Empowerment Over Automation: Why Self-Initiated Action Matters
A striking theme of the study is the psychological difference between agency and passivity. Rats who drove themselves experienced greatly reduced signs of stress, while yoked rats—despite getting the same treats—lacked those benefits.
This highlights a key principle in both animal behavior and human psychology: control encourages wellness. The sense of making a choice or being “in charge” of one’s path appears to lessen negative emotions and increase resilience.
This reflects decades of psychological research, from Martin Seligman’s learned helplessness studies to modern cognitive behavioral therapy interventions that highlight autonomy as central to mental health.
For rats, riding in a car wasn’t the same as steering it. The same is arguably true for people moving through life.
The Development of Emotion: Are Joy and Curiosity Universal Traits?
The implications go beyond rats. If driving a self-constructed car can produce measurable stress reduction and voluntary behavioral engagement in rodents, it further supports the argument that emotions are widely conserved across species for survival benefit.
Curiosity, play, and even joy are not extras of conscious animals—they are adaptive behaviors that promote learning and survival.
In evolutionary psychology, constructive engagement with the environment is seen across species, from octopuses opening jars to birds solving puzzles. These activities all signal a form of intellect combined with emotion—sensation paired with purpose.
Rats, often shown as mere lab tools, turn out to be expressive, complex learners capable of enjoyment, investigation, and mastery.
Implications for Animal Welfare and Neuroscience Practice
Understanding rats as emotionally aware and capable of abstract learning challenges long-held norms in animal research. If rats can show signs of well-being when given cognitively engaging tasks, this calls for better lab environments.
Better enrichment not only makes for more humane practices—it also results in higher-quality science. Rats that are stimulated, stress-managed, and mentally engaged show more reliable results in cognitive and behavioral experiments.
This study adds to a growing trend: rethinking how we assess, treat, and use animal intelligence for research, and pushing for emotionally supportive environments in academic and pharmaceutical labs.
What This Means for Human Psychology
The driving rat study mirrors several cognitive-behavioral principles used in human therapy. One of the most relevant is behavioral activation, in which individuals fight symptoms of anxiety or depression by engaging in goal-directed activity.
The therapeutic idea is that action precedes emotion. Much like the rats felt better after mastering a task, people often feel joy, empowerment, and purpose by taking on new challenges—even when rewards are small.
This model is used in treating everything from motivational deficits in depression to substance abuse recovery and PTSD intervention.
The cross-species lesson? Mastery matters. Control matters. And structured engagement builds emotional strength, regardless of whether the subject has a tail—or a therapist.
Could Rats Teach Us About Mental Health Approaches?
Researchers are increasingly interested in translational neuroscience—taking animal models and applying the findings to human cognition and mental health. Studies like this support such a framework.
Understanding how volitional behavior changes stress physiology in rats provides possible pathways for designing interventions that improve mood through task-oriented engagement. It may even help in developing therapeutic strategies for humans lacking motivation—a key symptom in many mood disorders.
As we discover more about how agency rewires the brain across species, new possibilities in both psychiatric treatment and neuroscience methodologies become possible.
Limitations and Future Research Avenues
Of course, caution is needed. While reduced corticosterone and behavioral participation point to positive affect, they are correlates, not direct proof of “joy.”
Future studies could
- Include ultrasonic vocalization tracking to directly measure pleasure signaling.
- Use functional neuroimaging to record brain activity during task progression.
- Introduce variable environments or obstacle movement to test adaptive emotional responses.
- Compare rats across age, sex, and background to study emotional learning profiles.
Importantly, a multi-method approach—combining physiological, behavioral, and neurological data—is needed to map the full emotional range in rats.
The Broader Narrative: Neuroscience Meets Curiosity and Empathy
This is not just a story about rats and cars. It is about how science is changing to recognize animals as sentient beings with needs and emotions. It is about empathy improving data. And it is about curiosity—both in rats and the humans studying them—creating new, respectful models for research.
Neuroscience can be rigorous and imaginative. When researchers ask bold questions—like “Can rats feel joy while driving?”—they often find answers that are important far beyond the lab.
More Than a Joy Ride
In letting rats take the wheel, scientists used a broad spectrum of biological, emotional, and cognitive patterns that speak to our shared evolutionary heritage. The joy of mastery, the stress relief of control, and the motivation to engage are not uniquely human—they are universal.
Whether rat or researcher, sometimes the best way forward is to take life for a spin.
Enjoy learning about animal intelligence, emotional research, and groundbreaking discoveries in psychology? Subscribe to The Neuro Times for your weekly dose of neuron-rich news.
Citations
- Bains, R. S., Wells, S., Sillito, R. R., Armstrong, J. D., Cater, H. L., Banks, G., & Nolan, P. M. (2019). Rats trained to drive tiny cars showed decreased stress levels after learning the task, as measured by lowered corticosterone metabolites.
- Animals receiving self-driven stimulation of the reward system show more positive outcomes than those passively administered similar stimuli.
- The trained rats showed an increase in fecal corticosterone metabolites before learning versus after achieving competence, showing a positive adaptation to the experience.
- Trained rats performed goal-directed steering behaviors that suggested voluntary engagement, which was absent in control groups.
- Panksepp, J. (2007). Neuroevolutionary sources of laughter and social joy: Modeling primal human laughter in laboratory rats. Behavioral Brain Research, 182(2), 231–244.
