Gender and Creativity: Are Traditions Wrong?

New research challenges traditional views on gender and creativity. Discover how shifting perspectives may reshape our understanding.
Conceptual illustration depicting gender differences in creativity, with bold brushstrokes and intricate patterns representing risk-taking and empathy.

⬇️ Prefer to listen instead? ⬇️


  • 🧠 Research shows that men engage in risk-taking while women leverage empathy as key drivers of creativity.
  • 🔍 A meta-analysis of 700 studies found that gender differences in creativity are due to social conditioning, not innate ability.
  • 🎭 Bias in creativity evaluations leads to men being perceived as more creative unless their gender is hidden.
  • 💡 Empathy-driven creativity results in more socially relevant and applicable innovations, challenging the focus on novelty.
  • 🚀 Organizations can foster creativity by balancing risk-taking and empathy-driven problem-solving in their innovation strategies.

Close-up of a creative brainstorming session

For years, creativity has been associated with independence, confidence, and risk-taking—traits traditionally linked with masculinity. A new study published in the Journal of Applied Psychology challenges this assumption, revealing that creativity manifests differently in men and women. The research highlights that while men lean into risk-taking, women harness empathy as a creative driver, offering a new perspective on how we evaluate and foster creativity in workplaces and society.

Vintage books and portraits of famous inventors

The Traditional View of Gender and Creativity

Historically, creativity has been linked to traits like boldness and novelty—qualities often associated with traditional masculinity. This perception has reinforced the idea that men are naturally more creative than women.

Throughout history, brilliant figures such as Leonardo da Vinci, Albert Einstein, and Steve Jobs have been celebrated for their groundbreaking creativity. However, the underrepresentation of women in creative fields does not stem from a lack of ability but from societal structures. Consider how women like Ada Lovelace and Rosalind Franklin contributed to computing and DNA research, respectively, yet were often overlooked.

The Role of Traditional Gender Roles

Traditional gender roles assign creativity to men by emphasizing traits like assertiveness, ambition, and risk-taking. Meanwhile, women are often encouraged to focus on nurturing, emotional intelligence, and relationship-building—traits historically undervalued in creative fields.

Studies show that even when men and women present the same ideas, men are often rated as more creative. This bias stems from an overemphasis on novelty while undervaluing usefulness, a critical aspect of creative endeavors.

Notebook with mind map of creative ideas

New Findings: Different, Not Less Creative

A comprehensive meta-analysis of 700 studies, encompassing 265,762 participants, sheds light on how men and women express creativity differently (Kim et al., 2024). The research confirmed that:

  • Men exhibit creativity primarily through risk-taking, making them more prone to generating novel but untested ideas.
  • Women, on the other hand, leverage empathy to develop creative solutions that address real-life problems.
  • Both traits—risk-taking and empathy—contribute meaningfully to creative expression but in distinct ways.

Split-screen of a daring adventurer and a caring nurse

Risk-Taking vs. Empathy in Creative Expression

Risk-Taking: The Boldness of Novelty

Risk-taking plays a vital role in creativity because it encourages individuals to pursue unconventional thinking. Those who take risks are not afraid of failure and often generate radical ideas that disrupt industries. Consider how Thomas Edison’s trial-and-error approach led to the invention of the light bulb.

However, risk-taking can also lead to impractical ideas that never materialize into useful applications. This highlights the limitations of equating boldness exclusively with creative success.

Empathy: The Power of Practical Innovation

Empathy allows individuals to understand the perspectives, frustrations, and desires of others, tailoring creative solutions to real-world challenges. Apple’s design success, often attributed to Steve Jobs, was equally shaped by empathy-driven user experience research from designers like Susan Kare, who revolutionized personal computing interfaces.

Empathy-driven creativity is particularly valuable in industries focusing on human-centered solutions, such as healthcare, education, and social innovation.

Helping hands supporting a lightbulb

Why Empathy May Be a More Powerful Driver of Creativity

Contrary to traditional beliefs, empathy-driven creativity can be more impactful when creativity is measured not just by novelty but also by usefulness. Key insights include:

  • Creativity isn’t just about generating new ideas; it’s also about making them practical.
  • Empathy-driven creativity enables solutions tailored to human needs, making them more applicable.
  • When usefulness was factored into evaluations, empathetic creativity was rated more highly than risk-taking creativity.

Historically, creative innovations that change society often stem from an empathetic understanding of human needs. For example:

  • Florence Nightingale revolutionized modern nursing by redesigning hospitals based on patient well-being.
  • Oprah Winfrey reshaped media by blending personal storytelling with deep emotional insights.

These examples underline that practical, user-friendly innovations—often fueled by empathy—can have a greater societal impact than risk-driven ideas that lack applicability.

Business meeting evaluating creative ideas anonymously

Challenging Gender Bias in Creativity Evaluations

The Effects of Gender on Creativity Perception

The study also uncovered a striking pattern in creativity evaluations:

  • When raters knew an individual’s gender, men were often judged as more creative.
  • However, when gender was concealed, the perceived gap disappeared.

This suggests that ingrained societal biases—not actual differences in creativity—may contribute to the perception that men are more creative.

Researchers believe this bias results from the traditional association of innovation with aggressive risk-taking rather than thoughtful problem-solving. The tendency to overlook women’s contributions aligns with broader patterns in workplace leadership evaluations, where men are often credited with strategic vision while women are valued for collaboration.

Children playing with art and engineering toys

The Role of Social Expectations in Shaping Creativity

How Early Socialization Influences Creative Expression

From a young age, boys and girls receive different messages about acceptable behavior:

  • Boys are encouraged to take risks, break rules, and challenge authority—behaviors conducive to bold creativity.
  • Girls are socialized to be considerate, cooperative, and emotionally intelligent, emphasizing creativity driven by interpersonal understanding.

These social patterns shape creative tendencies well into adulthood. Women may internalize fear of failure, making them less likely to embrace risk, while men may underutilize empathy due to social expectations discouraging emotional expression.

Modern office with creative collaboration

Implications for the Workplace and Innovation

How Workplace Structures Favor Risk-Taking Creativity

Many organizations favor bold, risk-tolerant creativity while overlooking the value of empathetic innovation. This bias impacts hiring, promotions, and workplace dynamics in several ways:

  • Risk-taking is often rewarded in leadership roles, leading to men being more frequently promoted for their “visionary” ideas.
  • Empathy-driven creative contributions, such as improving team collaboration and customer experience, are undervalued in traditional performance metrics.
  • The perception that bold, disruptive ideas matter more than socially-relevant innovations results in an imbalanced creative culture.

Steps Companies Can Take to Encourage Diverse Creative Strengths

To create environments where both risk-taking and empathy are equally nurtured, organizations should:

  • Design evaluation systems that equally value novelty and usefulness (Kim et al., 2024).
  • Encourage diverse approaches, combining risk-taking with empathy-driven problem-solving.
  • Train leaders to recognize and counteract gender biases in creativity assessments.
  • Invest in mentorship programs that foster creative risk-taking in women and emotional intelligence in men.

Hands joining in teamwork over a colorful table

Closing the Creativity Gap: Steps Forward

Individual Actions to Rethink Creativity

To bridge the gendered creativity gap, individuals can:

  • Challenge personal biases about what defines “true” creativity.
  • Encourage girls to take creative risks and explore unconventional ideas.
  • Support boys in developing emotional intelligence and empathy-driven innovation.

Broader Strategies for Change

  • Education systems should foster both risk-taking and empathy-driven creativity from an early age.
  • Organizations must systematically review how they assess and nurture creativity.
  • Cultural attitudes around gender and creativity need to be reframed to value diverse contributions equally.

This study challenges outdated notions of creativity by revealing the unique ways men and women contribute to innovation. Creativity is not a one-size-fits-all trait, nor should it be confined to traditional gender stereotypes. By valuing both risk-taking and empathy, organizations and society can foster a more inclusive, equitable approach to creative expression—one that benefits everyone.

FAQs

How has creativity traditionally been associated with gender roles?

Creativity has historically been linked to risk-taking and independence, traits culturally associated with masculinity.

What does new research reveal about how men and women express creativity?

Men often display creativity through risk-taking, while women leverage empathy to create innovative and useful solutions.

How do risk-taking and empathy influence creative expression?

Risk-taking drives novelty, while empathy fosters creativity that is both innovative and applicable to real-world needs.

How do societal biases affect how creativity is perceived and evaluated?

Men are often perceived as more creative due to cultural biases, but when gender is unknown, this gap disappears.

What steps can organizations take to foster equitable assessments of creativity?

Organizations should equally emphasize novelty and usefulness in creativity evaluations and address biases in how creative contributions are assessed.

Citation

Kim, J., Vaulont, M. J., Zhang, Z., & Byron, K. (2024). Looking inside the black box of gender differences in creativity: A dual-process model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/apl0001205

Previous Article

Can Your Nose Help You Hear? New Research Explained

Next Article

Nerve Stimulation: Why Doesn't It Always Work?

Write a Comment

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



⬇️ Want to listen to some of our other episodes? ⬇️

Subscribe to our Newsletter

Subscribe to our email newsletter to get the latest posts delivered right to your email.
Pure inspiration, zero spam ✨