⬇️ Prefer to listen instead? ⬇️
- 🧠 Strong self-focus and lack of care for others are strong signs of future criminal behavior.
- ⚠️ Bad experiences in childhood make crime more likely for people with psychopathic traits.
- 🧒 Good parental oversight makes crime less likely, even with psychopathic traits.
- 💰 Better socioeconomic status can reduce the link between psychopathy and crime.
- 🚫 Antisocial behavior by itself doesn’t predict crime, unless someone has a history of breaking rules.
Rethinking Psychopathy and Criminality
For many years, psychopathy has been thought of as the same as crime. But new research is showing this idea is wrong. New findings suggest that even people with strong psychopathic traits don’t always become criminals. Your surroundings—your family, your neighborhood, your childhood experiences—really matter. For mental health professionals, teachers, and anyone interested, this gives us a more hopeful and detailed way to understand psychopathy.
What Are Psychopathic Traits?
Psychopathic traits are a group of personality characteristics that include problems with emotions, relationships, and behavior. People often wrongly see them as signs of immediate danger or that someone is naturally a criminal. But in psychology, these traits come in different amounts. This means many people show traits linked to psychopathy to varying degrees, without being harmful or breaking rules.
In clinical and research settings, psychopathy is usually measured in three main ways:
- Self-focus: This trait means someone is extremely focused on themselves. They might think highly of themselves and not care about what others need or think. They often feel they deserve special treatment or are better than others. It is also linked to trying to control others and lying.
- Lack of Care: This means someone has little empathy, no regret, and feels distant from others. They might not react when others are upset. This lack of emotion often makes it hard to form real relationships or to understand how their actions affect others.
- Antisocial Behavior: This includes actions that go against what society expects, like breaking rules or committing crimes. This might mean acting on impulse, seeking thrills, being aggressive, and not controlling one’s behavior well. People often think this is the main part of psychopathy. But we will see that it might not predict long-term criminal behavior as well as emotional traits do.
It is important to stress that these traits are not the same as having a diagnosis. People with many of these traits might meet the rules for Antisocial Personality Disorder (ASPD) or be called “psychopaths” by some psychology tests, like the Hare Psychopathy Checklist. But most people who show some psychopathic traits are not criminals or dangerous.
Psychologists and researchers often use tools like the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale (LSRP). This scale measures main features (emotional and relationship-based) and secondary ones (behavior and impulsivity). These tools help researchers understand the different parts of psychopathy. They also help predict things like career success, relationship problems, or, in this case, criminal behavior.
Psychopathic Traits and Criminal Behavior
Linking psychopathic traits to criminal behavior has been done for a long time. People who score high in psychopathy are found more often in prisons. Studies show that 15% to 25% of people in prison have clinical psychopathy. This is much higher than the 1% in the general population.
Typical ideas of a psychopath—clever, emotionless, controlling—are often linked to serial offenders, violent criminals, and big fraudsters. But this view is more and more seen as too simple.
The important long-term study by Veltman et al. (2025) looks at things in more detail. By following people over time, the researchers found that self-focus and lack of care were better signs of criminal charges than antisocial behavior. This was true unless the antisocial behavior followed earlier rule-breaking.
This is a big change from many old ideas that focus a lot on acting on impulse or outward behavior. Instead, this study puts attention on inner feelings. Not caring about others’ pain and a strong focus on oneself might matter more than thrill-seeking or risk-taking as the main reasons for illegal acts.
So, what does this mean? To stop crime, we might need to focus on the emotional and relationship reasons behind behavior, not just what people do.
Not All with Psychopathic Traits Become Criminals
The idea that psychopathic traits directly lead to crime is changing. A model of psychopathy suggests these traits only lead to crime under certain environmental conditions. This means personal traits work with outside factors to cause results, good or bad.
For example, someone with a lot of lack of care might never commit a crime if they grow up in a caring, structured home. But those same traits might cause criminal behavior when combined with abuse, poverty, or not getting enough care. The traits are not bad on their own; how they affect someone depends on the situation.
Interestingly, some psychopathic traits can even be helpful in some situations that are not about crime. Studies show that strong self-focus can help people do well in leadership, politics, or tough business settings. In these structured places, their traits might turn into being firm, staying calm under pressure, and taking smart risks.
This new way of thinking questions society’s habit of seeing psychopathy as the same as evil. Instead, it helps us see human potential in a more complex way, allowing for both problems and strength.
The Role of Socioeconomic Status (SES)
Among all the things that affect whether psychopathic traits lead to criminal behavior, socioeconomic status is one of the strongest protections.
The Veltman et al. (2025) findings show that people with many psychopathic traits who lived in higher-SES environments were much less likely to get criminal records. This shows us a practical point: having chances and support means people are less likely to need or find ways to act on these traits in a criminal way.
High-SES environments usually give:
- Stable housing and living conditions
- Good education and after-school activities
- Better medical and mental health services
- Social groups that give support and guidance
- Set routines that help people follow rules
It’s not that money buys good morals. It is about creating a life where bad ways of coping, like crime, are less needed or useful. This also shows how unfair systems hurt people from poorer backgrounds more. The same psychopathic traits in someone from a poor neighborhood might lead to crime. But in a well-off home, they might drive ambition or success as a leader.
Parental Monitoring vs. Parental Presence
Many people think crime comes from parents not being there. But this idea is too simple. The Veltman study showed a more exact reason: what parents watch over matters more than just them being around.
What is parental monitoring? It includes:
- Knowing where your child is and with whom
- Setting and sticking to rules for growth
- Having open talks
- Letting kids be independent but still watching them
Parental monitoring was a strong way to prevent future criminal behavior, even with different amounts of psychopathic traits. This especially affected total psychopathy scores. It suggests that regular checking can lessen dangerous behavior.
On the other hand, if parents were home but not involved—emotionally distant or not paying attention to a child’s social life and behavior—it didn’t help much.
This changes advice for parents. Good talks, clear feedback, and being held responsible help kids learn self-control. This then shows up as law-abiding behavior later. For children with a lot of lack of care or self-focus, involved parenting could be the difference between them becoming antisocial or not.
Bad Childhood Experiences as a Cause
Bad Childhood Experiences (ACEs) like abuse, neglect, family problems, and being exposed to violence are known to make many bad things in life more likely, from drug abuse to long-term sickness. But what happens when bad childhood experiences meet psychopathy?
The study found that people with a lot of self-focus who also had many ACEs were much more likely to commit crimes. Emotional distance or self-focus alone didn’t predict crime. It only did when made worse by trauma, feeling unsafe, or not getting enough care early on.
Also, while parental absence was not directly linked to more crime, when combined with self-focus, it greatly increased risk. This suggests that children already likely to be emotionally distant or self-focused suffer most from unstable homes and not getting enough care.
This finding gives a guide for mental health professionals and teachers: checking for trauma and helping at-risk young people early—especially those with difficult personalities—can lower the chance of problems later.
What Traits Predict Crime? Unexpected Findings
The study’s look at which psychopathic traits were linked to future crimes showed surprising differences:
- Self-focus: Strongly predicts crime, mostly when combined with bad childhood experiences or little parental checking. These people might believe their harmful actions are okay because they see themselves as important.
- Lack of Care: Linked to emotional coldness and less guilt or empathy, lack of care was another main predictor of criminal activity. This was true especially for crimes against people, like fraud or assault.
- Antisocial Behavior: By itself, it did not predict crime unless the person had broken rules before. This suggests that antisocial behaviors are more a reaction than a basic cause.
In short, problems with emotions and relationships, more than reckless behavior, carry a higher long-term risk. This means we need to stop seeing criminals as just “impulsive rule-breakers.”
Environmental Protections That Work
Researchers found clear environmental conditions that effectively lower the risk that psychopathic traits cause crime:
Good Protections
- Higher Socioeconomic Status: As we said, this gives access to support systems that make criminal behavior less likely.
- Strong Parental Monitoring: Watching kids, while letting them be independent, helps shape good behavior.
- Low Exposure to Bad Childhood Experiences: Avoiding trauma and learning to be strong can stop dangerous actions from hidden traits.
Protections With Less Effect
- Parental Absence Alone: Was not a key factor unless combined with certain traits.
- Parent-Child Relationship Quality: Surprisingly, feeling close emotionally didn’t statistically lower crime risk. But it might still help with emotions and growth.
- Neighborhood Disorder: Chaos outside the home did not strongly predict future behavior when other factors were considered.
These findings suggest that structured, stable care—like income support and parents being involved—protects more than just emotional warmth or how good a neighborhood feels.
What This Means for Prevention & Helping
Understanding that personality traits work with the environment calls for better ways to help.
- Trauma-Focused Help: Schools, therapy programs, and youth services should add trauma checks to their plans.
- Early Parental Support: Parent coaching, guidance, and educational programs help caregivers use good ways to watch over their kids.
- Community Support: Government actions must focus on unequal income, making communities stable, and fair education for all.
- Avoiding Labels: Looking at behavior in its setting, instead of quickly labeling kids as “troubled” or “dangerous,” helps stop them from being shamed.
Small steps taken early can stop bigger problems later, especially for those with personalities that make them more likely to face problems.
What This Means for Society
What would public health and criminal justice systems look like if they were based on empathy and stopping problems, rather than just reacting and punishing?
This research points to a new way of doing things:
- Early Mental Health Checks: Find trait mixes and environmental stresses before behavior gets worse.
- Put Money into Community Resources: Libraries, after-school programs, safe housing, and jobs for young people can change lives.
- Stop Criminalizing Poverty and Trauma: A justice system that looks at causes can stop crime from passing down through families.
Ultimately, this leads to a more caring, useful, and cheaper way to handle public safety and mental health.
Limits of the Research
This study is thorough, but we need to mention a few limits:
- Relies on Self-Reports: People in the study might not fully or correctly report their own traits, actions, or family lives.
- Cultural Focus: Done in the Netherlands, the findings might not apply to all cultures or systems.
- When Measured: Many environment factors were checked late in the teen years, possibly missing earlier, more shaping influences.
But its contribution to research is big. It shows how important the setting is in how risky psychological traits appear.
Looking Ahead: Future Research Questions
The study opens the way for more detailed questions:
- Can certain mixes of traits predict results in things like careers, relationships, or overall health?
- How do gender, culture, and different brain wiring mix with psychopathic traits and environmental protections?
- What brain connections cause low empathy or too much self-focus—and can we change them?
We have only just started to understand this and put it to use. Future research from different fields could find even stronger protections and support tools.
People Are Complex, Lives Are Shaped by Settings
Psychopathic traits are not a sure sign of bad or illegal behavior. Like all psychological habits, how they affect someone depends on where they grow up: parents, poverty, trauma, education, chances in life. Some settings build strength. Others make problems worse. This makes our role as a society clear: create places where even young people at risk can do well.
Let’s Change How We Talk About This
Instead of judging quickly, let’s ask the better question: what help does this person need? With care, research, and changes to systems, we can make labels into learning. And we can stop cycles of harm before they start.
Citations
Veltman, E., Garofalo, C., Hill, J.M., Blokland, A., & Sellbom, M. (2025). Do early environmental factors influence the relationship between psychopathy and crime? Longitudinal findings from the transitions in Amsterdam study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 102399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2025.102399
