⬇️ Prefer to listen instead? ⬇️
- 🧠 Emotional attraction is deeply tied to secure attachment styles and long-term relationship success.
- 🧬 Physical and sexual attraction engage distinct but overlapping brain reward systems.
- 🖼️ Aesthetic attraction can exist independently of romantic or sexual feelings.
- 💬 Intellectual attraction activates similar brain circuits to romantic love.
- ⚠️ Misaligned types of attraction often cause friction in otherwise functional relationships.
What Are the 6 Types of Attraction?
Attraction might seem like a simple feeling—being drawn to someone—but it’s far more layered than it appears. You can admire someone’s mind, crave their physical presence, feel inspired by their beauty, or want to build a life with them—and each of these reflects a different form of attraction. By understanding the six main types of attraction, you will better know your own feelings, how you connect with people, and why some relationships work well while others are confusing or cause problems.
A Scientific Lens on Attraction
Though attraction can feel confusing or mystical, science reveals it’s largely governed by neuropsychological and physiological processes. When you’re attracted to someone, your brain activates a cascade of neurotransmitters and hormones, including dopamine (linked to reward and motivation), oxytocin (associated with bonding), and serotonin (influencing mood and focus). These brain chemicals flood the system, creating powerful emotional and physical responses.
In a pivotal 2005 study, researchers (Aron et al., 2005) used neuroimaging to examine individuals in love. They found that romantic attraction activated the brain’s reward system, particularly in areas rich in dopamine activity such as the ventral tegmental area. This means that being attracted isn’t just a conscious choice. It is also a basic response meant to help with reproduction, social bonding, and survival.
Interestingly, these systems are not exclusive to romantic or sexual feelings. Variations in hormonal concentrations and prior psychological conditioning can influence whether you develop physical, emotional, or intellectual attraction—or all three.
Emotional Attraction: The Root of Deep Connection
Emotional attraction refers to feeling drawn to someone’s inner qualities—such as their kindness, empathy, authenticity, and vulnerability. It’s deep, connective, and develops through meaningful conversations, shared experiences, and mutual understanding. Emotional attraction often forms the backbone of stable friendships and long-term romantic partnerships.
Unlike fleeting infatuations, emotional attraction takes time to cultivate. It’s characterized less by dopamine-fueled highs and more by oxytocin-enhanced bonding. You might feel comfortable sharing your thoughts, confiding your fears, or simply enjoying silent companionship with someone. It’s not necessarily linked with sexual desire but can underlie romantic intimacy when combined with other forms of attraction.
According to Hazan & Shaver’s 1987 research on attachment theory, people with secure attachment styles are much more likely to build healthy emotional relationships. In contrast, anxious or avoidant attachment styles can hinder the ability to express or receive emotional support, distorting the perception of emotional attraction.
Emotional attraction acts as a mirror, reflecting your unmet emotional needs and internal values. It drives deep connections that go beyond looks or physical chemistry. And it is key for making safe, strong bonds.
Physical Attraction: The Power of the Sensory Brain
When most people think of attraction, physical gaze and visual appeal often come to mind. Physical attraction is what draws you to another’s physique, facial features, voice tone, or body movements. It’s highly sensory—what you see, hear, smell, and even feel through touch can all shape your sense of physical allure.
While often conflated with sexual attraction, physical attraction doesn’t necessarily mean you want a sexual relationship. For instance, you might find someone’s smile comforting or admire their posture, yet feel no drive toward more intimate acts.
Biologically, humans are wired to respond to certain visual cues that imply health, fertility, and genetic viability. Rhodes (2006) notes that facial symmetry, facial averageness, and certain body ratios are widely perceived as signals of attractiveness. However, these perceptions are also shaped by cultural standards, media exposure, and personal experience.
Importantly, physical attraction can change. Over time, someone you barely noticed physically can grow more attractive as emotional or intellectual connections develop. Conversely, high initial physical attraction may diminish without supportive emotional or mental bonds.
Recognizing the boundaries between physical and sexual attraction allows for more accurate self-understanding and prevents confusion in relationships where only sensory appreciation exists.
Sexual Attraction: Beyond the Biological Drive
Sexual attraction is the instinctive or desire-based impulse to engage in sexual activity with someone. It involves powerful cues—such as pheromones, body language, chemistry, and voice—that stimulate a biological and psychological craving for intimate connection.
Neurobiologically, sexual desire is stirred by surges of dopamine and increased testosterone or estrogen levels. These chemical interactions prime the brain for arousal and potential reproduction, though in modern society, sexual attraction often exists independently of reproductive goals.
Sexual attraction functions across a diverse spectrum of orientations and intensity. Some individuals may experience frequent, spontaneous sexual attraction (known as allosexual), while others may barely or never experience it—a valid identity known as asexuality. Importantly, asexual individuals may still thrive in romantic, emotional, or intellectual relationships.
It’s also crucial to differentiate between sexual attraction and sexual activity. Wanting sex doesn’t necessarily mean wanting an emotional or long-term bond, and vice versa. These distinctions can prevent misunderstandings in “friends-with-benefits,” polyamorous, or strictly romantic engagements.
Sexual attraction can coexist with all other types or operate individually. Its presence can deepen emotional intimacy—or, if not reciprocated or clearly communicated—cause confusion or strain in a relationship.
Romantic Attraction: Wanting to Build a Future
Romantic attraction is the feeling of wanting to be emotionally and affectionately close with someone, often involving a desire for companionship, shared growth, and exclusivity. While it frequently overlaps with emotional and sexual attraction, it focuses more on the yearning for connection, affection, and partnership.
Psychologist Dorothy Tennov coined the term “limerence” to describe the early phase of intense romantic attraction marked by obsession, fantasizing, heightened emotions, and a longing for reciprocation (Tennov, 1979). While limerence can feel exhilarating, it doesn’t always indicate genuine romantic compatibility or emotional health.
Romantic attraction motivates you to go on dates, imagine a life together, or invest time and energy into creating shared memories. Importantly, it can exist across various relationship structures—monogamous, polyamorous, queerplatonic—and isn’t contingent on sexual desire.
For aromantic individuals—those who experience little or no romantic desire—romantic attraction may never arise, or it may take nontraditional forms. These identities reveal that attraction isn’t a one-size-fits-all model but a highly subjective experience.
Recognizing romantic attraction helps clarify relational intentions. For instance, if someone enjoys your company but doesn’t wish to “date,” they might feel emotional attraction but lack romantic interest.
Aesthetic Attraction: Seeing Beauty Without Desire
Have you ever admired someone’s appearance without any urge to engage romantically or sexually? That’s aesthetic attraction—an appreciation for another’s surface qualities based purely on visual or stylistic pleasure.
Aesthetic attraction is similar to admiring art or nature. You might be drawn to someone’s haircut, fashion sense, symmetry, or overall vibe, but it’s not accompanied by physical or emotional longing.
It’s one of the most misunderstood types of attraction because society often assumes visible admiration implies deeper desire. But appreciating someone’s fragrance or color coordination doesn’t mean you want a relationship—just like admiring a sports car doesn’t mean you want to buy it.
This form of attraction is particularly common in creative or fashion-forward communities, where appearance signals identity, status, or uniqueness rather than appeal for intimacy.
Understanding aesthetic attraction helps build healthier social interactions and reduces false assumptions. Recognizing it can spare you awkward situations like misinterpreting compliments as flirtation.
Intellectual Attraction: The Appeal of the Mind
Intellectual attraction is the excitement and curiosity you feel toward someone’s thoughts, outlook, or problem-solving abilities. It’s conversational chemistry—when their mind stimulates yours, and ideas spark, leading to long discussions, mental sparks, and friendly debates.
This cerebral type of attraction often shows up in academic, professional, or creative settings. You might feel drawn to someone after hearing them present at a conference, reading their writing, or observing their insights in a brainstorming session.
Zeki & Romaya (2008) discovered that intellectual and romantic attraction can activate similar brain reward systems, making “falling in love with someone’s mind” a neurological reality.
For demisexual or sapiosexual individuals, intellectual connection may serve as a prerequisite for engaging in emotional or sexual attraction. In these cases, the mind is not just a friendship builder but also a romantic gateway.
Appreciating intellectual attraction can make relationships better by showing value for deeper, non-physical bonds. It also explains how meaningful connections often emerge in places where shared ideas and worldviews converge.
The Intersectionality of Attraction: When Lines Blur
Attraction doesn’t follow tidy categories. Most people experience multiple types of attraction simultaneously, though they may ebb and flow based on context, time, or emotional maturity.
For instance, you might begin a relationship based on intellectual attraction, but over time develop emotional and physical intimacy. Alternatively, strong physical attraction might fade if emotional compatibility proves lacking.
It’s also common—but confusing—when attractions misalign between people. You might see someone as a romantic prospect while they only feel aesthetic attraction toward you. Understanding and naming these types creates room for honest communication and boundary-setting.
Terms like “queerplatonic relationships” or “alterous attraction” (a form that’s neither strictly romantic nor platonic) further underscore attraction’s vast, nuanced spectrum. These changing concepts challenge two-part ideas about love and relationships.
The more accurately you can define your own experiences, the easier it becomes to build a relationship that honors your truth.
Neurodivergence and Attraction
For individuals who are neurodivergent—living with ADHD, autism, sensory processing disorders, or other neurological differences—experiencing and interpreting attraction may come with unique challenges and strengths.
Some may hyper-fixate on a romantic or intellectual interest (a trait common in ADHD), while others may struggle with processing emotional cues or establishing physical comfort zones (as is often true in autism).
For some, attraction can be muted or delayed, making it tricky to distinguish between platonic admiration and romantic yearning. Others may over-identify with one form of attraction and miss subtler signs of deeper feelings.
These differences don’t invalidate attraction—they just require different timelines and communication strategies. Awareness, patience, and open talk are especially important for building healthy neurodivergent partnerships.
Agreed Definitions vs. Popular Misunderstandings
Everyday language muddies the waters of attraction. Media and pop culture often conflate physical beauty with sexual appeal or equate romantic interest with emotional depth. This lack of clarity distorts expectations.
For example:
- Someone saying “He’s attractive” might mean aesthetic, sexual, or emotional appeal.
- Feeling “a connection” doesn’t always imply romance—it could be intellectual or emotional.
- Obsessing over someone might be limerence, not love.
Clarity starts with language. Practicing intentional communication—such as asking “Are you attracted to me emotionally, sexually, or both?”—helps mitigate confusion and mismatched expectations.
Understanding the nuance among different types of attraction can improve dating success, strengthen friendships, and deepen self-awareness.
Relationship Health and Attraction Mismatches
Incompatibility in attraction types is a hidden cause of many relationship breakdowns. One person may prioritize emotional connection while the other seeks sexual excitement. When these needs go unspoken, resentment often builds.
Healthy relationships require alignment in at least some types—or at the very least, an awareness and willingness to meet in the middle. For example, if one partner doesn’t feel sexual attraction and the other does, mutual understanding and agreements (like open practices or emotional centering) can maintain balance.
Regular relationship check-ins, communication tools like the Gottman method, and therapy sessions can support these conversations.
It’s not about perfect alignment—it’s about mutual respect and recognizing that partnerships are customized, not standardized.
When to Seek Professional Help
If you’re confused, overwhelmed, or continually drawn into unfulfilling or contradictory relational patterns, consider engaging with a licensed therapist or counselor.
Therapists skilled in Attachment Theory, Trauma-Informed Care, or Emotion-Focused Therapy (EFT) can help you unpack your patterns regarding attachment, attraction, and intimacy. Additionally, support groups may validate non-mainstream identities like asexuality or sapiosexuality.
If your patterns of attraction cause you distress, isolation, or conflict with personal values, professional support can help recalibrate your emotional compass.
Tools for Better Self-Awareness Around Attraction
Better relationships begin with better self-awareness. Journaling, talking with trusted friends, or working with a coach or therapist can surface recurring themes.
Ask yourself:
- What traits catch my attention first in someone?
- Do my attractions lead to fulfilling outcomes?
- Which type of attraction matters most to me long-term?
Self-discovery tools:
- Myers-Briggs + Enneagram assessments
- Attachment Style diagnostics
- Asexuality/Aromantic spectrum quizzes
- Reflective journaling: “Who have I felt connected to vs infatuated with?”
The goal isn’t to categorize yourself rigidly, but to better understand the sensations and instincts that guide your relational behavior.
Attraction as a Neuro-Psychological Compass
Each form of attraction you experience—emotional, physical, sexual, romantic, aesthetic, or intellectual—offers a window into your values, needs, and core identity. Naming, understanding, and respecting each type helps you handle relationships with more clarity, mutual respect, and self-assurance.
Whether you’re finding beauty in someone’s mind, wanting closeness, admiring from afar, or figuring out what kind of love fits your life, attraction becomes a compass. It points not just toward others, but also deeper into yourself.
References
Aron, A., Fisher, H., Mashek, D. J., Strong, G., Li, H., & Brown, L. L. (2005). Reward, motivation, and emotion systems associated with early-stage intense romantic love. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94(1), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00838.2004
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208
Tennov, D. (1979). Love and Limerence: The Experience of Being in Love. Scarborough House.
Zeki, S., & Romaya, J. P. (2008). Neural correlates of hate. PLoS ONE, 3(10), e3556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003556
